By Wonsuh Song
Education is an expansive endeavor that strives to unlock human potential rather than simply transmit knowledge. In teacher‑training programs we must repeatedly ask: What kind of person should an educator be? MBTI research shows that introverts and extroverts exist in roughly equal numbers worldwide, yet the stereotype of the “charismatic, high‑energy teacher” continues to dominate hiring practices, evaluation systems, and parental expectations. Such a narrow archetype constricts the profession and undermines the diversity of strengths that schools need.
Just as student bodies are heterogeneous, so must teaching corps be. Extroverted teachers inspire momentum and enthusiasm, but introverted educators can offer meticulous observation and deep empathy—especially for quieter students whose needs often remain invisible. Likewise, guiding disruptive or intensely individualistic pupils requires teachers who combine firm principles with genuine warmth. When schools embrace the full spectrum of personality, they become inclusive platforms where every learner can flourish.
For preservice teachers, the design of the very first lesson is critical. Students form a lasting impression within the opening forty‑five minutes; if they conclude the teacher can be easily challenged, classroom management grows exponentially harder. Even naturally introverted teachers must therefore project competence and authority from day one. Practical strategies include: (1) framing lessons around “key questions” that demand immediate student engagement, (2) practicing vocal tone, posture, and eye contact to sharpen nonverbal authority, and (3) announcing evaluation criteria and behavioral expectations within the first five minutes. A well‑prepared plan and clear rules prevent the “piecemeal erosion” of respect.
Teacher‑training curricula can scaffold personality‑based strengths. Introverted candidates benefit from “interaction script workshops” that rehearse live classroom dialogue, while extroverted candidates develop reflective depth through “listening labs” and analytical journals. The goal is not to alter personality but to widen pedagogical repertoires anchored in authentic traits.
Students, too, should not be measured by the size of their social circles. Some adolescents feel isolated despite extensive peer networks; others find stability with only a few close friends. Effective educators abandon the crude metric of popularity and instead help students identify passions, talents, and values. This may require dedicated counseling hours, targeted advice on career paths, and referrals to community or professional resources when necessary.
Teacher resilience is equally pivotal. Adolescents can unintentionally wound teachers with immature behavior. Safeguarding mental health therefore entails (1) building horizontal peer‑mentoring networks among teachers and (2) embedding emotional labor training in professional‑development cycles. Such structures enhance the sustainability of the teaching vocation.
Ultimately, the ideal educator is not confined to any singular MBTI code or extroverted facade. Rather, excellence rests on three pillars: honoring student diversity, displaying clear expertise and leadership in the inaugural lesson, and providing ongoing emotional support grounded in robust self‑care. Where teachers and learners grow together, the true promise of education is realized.
Wonsuh Song (Ph.D.)
Full‑time Lecturer, Shumei University / NKNGO Forum Representative
댓글 남기기